Working Life

« Guest Workers: What To Do? | Main | The Crisis Builds »

January 20, 2006

Transit Workers Reject Contract

    I was going to post, quite late today, about a picket line I took part in this early morning against Rep. Gregory Meeks (he's one of the CAFTA 15) at JFK airport. But, hey, we've got the transit workers rejecting the negotiated contract.

    Here's what New York 1 is reporting:

Transport Workers Union members have voted to reject their proposed contract with the MTA. The union's membership rejected the contract by a slim margin, just seven votes.

Over 22,000 of the TWU's 34,000 members voted, and the final tally was 11,234 members against and 11,227 in favor of the proposed three-year deal.

TWU Local 100 President Roger Toussaint made the announcement Friday afternoon, one month after the three-day transit strike that crippled the city. Toussaint supported the contract, and blamed the rejection of the proposal on what he called "downright lies" told by union members who opposed the deal.

He added that TWU members were worried by Governor George Pataki's threat to veto a key $110 million refund of pension plan contributions that was included in the rejected proposal.

Toussaint said the union is ready to resume negotiations with the MTA as soon as possible, but the MTA could push for binding arbitration instead. Although it is unlikely, the union could also vote to authorize yet another transit strike if the two sides cannot reach agreement on a new contract.

The MTA had no immediate comment on the vote. Voting on the contract was conducted by phone and through the Internet, and ended today at noon.

One of the main arguments against the rejected contract was that employees would have been required for the first time to pay 1.5 percent of their salaries toward their health care premiums.

The contract would have given workers raises of 3 percent, 4 percent and 3.5 percent over the next three years.

    I had heard that there was a determined campaign against the contract and Touissant was out there trying to get it ratified. But, I think people felt hugely empowered by the strike and I think the workers think they can do better--though it's hard to see the union going out on strike. Remember, some people got a large rebate from pension money they had put in some years ago--about 20,000 workers got $14,000--but the majority did not get that money and they are feeling the pinch of the fines from the strike.

 

January 20, 2006 in Inside Labor | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b76269e200d8342623ee53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Transit Workers Reject Contract:

» NYC Transit Workers Reject New Contract from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
The city's 33,000 union transit workers narrowly rejected a proposed contract Friday, one month to t [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 20, 2006 4:33:07 PM

Comments

Thanks for the update. It will interesting how the media will spin this one. It provides us all an opportunity to consider if we are doing enough to fight the loss of traditional pension plans that protect working people.

John Ryan, Cleveland AFL-CIO

Posted by: John Ryan | Jan 21, 2006 11:25:32 AM

Remember, some people got a large rebate from pension money they had put in some years ago--about 20,000 workers got $14,000--but the majority did not get that money and they are feeling the pinch of the fines from the strike.

I'm unclear on the math here. The article states that the TWU has 32,000 members. If 20,000 of them got a rebate, then that's a majority that DID get money. Maybe the 20,000 number covers past as well as present members? Maybe it's a typo?

I know this is a minor point but the pedant in me is just screaming for clarity.

Posted by: NathanHJ | Jan 21, 2006 1:05:52 PM

my mistake. It was the majority. opppssss.

Posted by: Tasini | Jan 22, 2006 1:13:27 AM

Where were the the 11,000+ TWU members who did not vote ?

Posted by: Afree Marquette | Jan 23, 2006 7:16:35 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.