« More on Delphi Demise | Main | Prop 75 Redux »
October 11, 2005
Grim Outlook On Prop 75
Yours truly is out here in Los Angeles and the big, bad news here is that labor is quite worried about the prospects for defeating Proposition 75. This is an Arnold Schwarzenegger-backed initiative that would require government employee unions to give prior notice to members before using dues on political activity.
This is an issue that the AFL-CIO and Change To Win should be coordinating together. This is definitely "an injury to one is an injury to all" situation: if the Steroid Guv is successful, it will send a ripple across the country and encourage future initiatives aimed at public employee unions, as well as unions in the private sector.
At the recent AFL-CIO Executive Council meeting, I was told by a source close to the Council that, when Prop 75 was discussed, "There was actually a little bit of tension because the public sector unions are the only ones doing any work on it out there (besides SEIU). That seems to be a pervasive problem throughout the movement – we aren’t able to see past our own members’ self interests. And it’s the reason corporations (and soon cities and states) have been able to pick off our retirement security – they have taken it to us one piece at a time. No one really rallied to the USWA’s side when their members’ pensions got decimated by the exploitation of the bankruptcy code by the big steel companies. No one has helped the airline unions as the same is happening there. And now no one is really helping the public sector as they go after our members’ pensions (the first step in CA is taking away our ability to put money into politics, then they will easily beat us when they go for our pensions)."
Below is an excerpt from a piece in yesterday's Los Angeles Times which gives a pretty frank and grim assessment by labor leaders out here about the state of play on Prop. 75. Call your unions and get them to roll out the guns on this one.
Prop. 75 Worries Union Leaders
Many in the rank and file could support the measure, which would limit use of members' dues. Opponents have been slow to rally.
By Michael Finnegan, Times Staff Writer
With thousands of Californians already voting by mail, leaders of organized labor are increasingly anxious about the strength of their push to mobilize union members against Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's November ballot measures.
Their chief worries are that many won't vote and that many of those who do will support Proposition 75, a measure fiercely opposed by labor leaders yet alluring to many in the rank and file.
The measure, backed by Schwarzenegger, would bar government employee unions from spending members' dues on political campaigns without prior consent. Labor leaders fear it would sharply diminish their ability to make campaign donations, tilting the balance of political power in California toward business interests.
"We're not winning on this thing, and we've got to step it up," Steven Neal, a Los Angeles County Federation of Labor official, told scores of union leaders at a campaign breakfast last week in downtown Los Angeles. He likened the battle against Proposition 75 to a "sinking ship" in need of rescue.
The gathering, called by the labor federation, was designed to arouse a sense of urgency among union political operatives in fighting Schwarzenegger's agenda in the Nov. 8 election.
But the event also showcased the nervousness among union leaders, who fear that the Republican governor could pull off a victory with Proposition 75. Polls have found most voters support the measure, one of four Schwarzenegger is campaigning to get passed.
Passage of Proposition 75 would be a major setback to the nation's fractured labor movement. Unions representing more than 5 million workers have bolted the AFL-CIO this year, a rupture that has distracted the national leadership from labor's high-stakes clash with Schwarzenegger...."
October 11, 2005 in Labor | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b76269e200d8342531d353ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Grim Outlook On Prop 75:
» Agency Fee Digest from Moscow Education (Idaho)
The Sacramento Bee published a piece this morning that explains in layman's terms what an agency... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 11, 2005 8:26:03 PM
» Losing Hearts from Unions-Firms-Markets
Many progressives, liberals and unionists would probably say that our problems stem from lack of political power. But our lack of power has its roots in something even more important and that is our ability to capture the hearts and [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 11, 2005 11:12:20 PM
Comments
Working class supporters of Sen. John McCain should pay attention to his support of this referendum.
Posted by: pw | Oct 11, 2005 7:21:29 AM
It's simply not true that the only folks working to defeat Prop. 75 are those in public sector unions. The building trades, cal labor federation, central labor councils, independents like CTA and Cal Nurses, pretty much everyone is working together.
There is no coordination from CTW because they don't really exist in California. Their member unions are still working with the AFL-CIO CLCs.
The AFL-CIO is not doing much (except delaying the enforcement of their rules about non-AFL unions not working with CLCs). But Sweeney at least attended the Labor Day rally in L.A. to speak out against Arnold. That's because California labor leaders have been telling the AFL-CIO that the right wing agenda fronted by Arnold will be coming at everyone else around the US.
Similarly, the building trades folks are understanding that if Prop. 75 passes, their "wages and pensions will be on the chopping block." Folks seem to be pretty united around a common enemy. The problem is whether that translates into getting out the vote to defeat Schwarzenegger. But despite all the hand wringing, it's possible that the fears about Prop. 75 are overstated. As in other states where similar measure have been enacted, unions will find creative ways and loopholes to continue to raise funds for political campaigns.
Posted by: pablo | Oct 11, 2005 12:52:36 PM
as to finding creative ways to raise funds in other states... the following is from 9/28/05 Christian Science Monitor
"Proposition 75 in California is part of a national strategy by Republicans to weaken labor unions and go after one of the biggest sources of income for Democrats and Democratic causes," says Steven Schier, a political scientist at Carleton College in Northfield, Minn.
"Such has been the case in the state of Washington, where passage of a similar law in 1992 - by 72 percent of voters - led to a precipitous drop in political contributions from teacher union members in the first year: from 48,000 contributors to 8,000. When Utah passed a similar law in 2001, only 6.8 percent of teacher union members allowed their dues to be spent on politics."
There is no way to over state the horendous impact the passage of Prop. 75 will have on all unions in california and the nation by extension.
The reason private sector unions are fighting Prop 75 is that it impacts all unions with ANY public sector members and in California that is just about everybody.
The ultimate target is the law that gives public sector union legal standing for purposes of collective bargaining...it was passed in 1968.
They aren't just coming for our pensions next year they are coming for our right to have a union—Missouri and Indiana this year, California next year.
Posted by: coet | Oct 11, 2005 6:06:18 PM
This will have huge repercussions all over the country. I'm sure it will affect us-UVA will jump at the chance to restrict our payroll deducted dues and our ESTEEMED Repiglican legislature will jump on board.
One can only pray the Democrat Tim Kaine wins the governorship.
Posted by: Jan | Oct 11, 2005 7:39:07 PM
Here at UNITE-HERE Local 11 in LA, we're up to our old tricks. Along with SEIU 1877 (janitors) we always pull together a large rank-and-file GOTV campaign for local elections and state ballot initiatives. Along with supporting a pro-labor city council candidate this November, we're working to defeat Prop 75 and several other propositions backed by Schwartzeneger. Wish us luck.
Posted by: Local 11 | Oct 11, 2005 8:07:50 PM
I'm spending most of my working hours fighting Prop 75 and the Governor's other right wing measures these days. Nonetheless, contrarian thoughts run through my mind about it.
What if...as a result of losing the "easy money" political contributions we were compelled by circumstances to go out and organize at the site level to win gains instead of relying on an all-powerful state political machine?
I'm not advocating this, you understand. I think the political fallout for labor nationally from losing this election would be terrible. But it wouldn't be terrible for unions to spend more time connecting with members,and building power work site by work site and community by community. That's a better and more sustainable model than "I pay my dues--you (the union guys) fix it."
Posted by: Doug | Oct 11, 2005 8:17:34 PM
Doug, I think you put it well--it would be interesting to see how losing "easy money" might generate more organizing but also that Prop 75 can't be allowed to pass given the current system and state of affairs.
Posted by: Tasini | Oct 11, 2005 9:42:34 PM
Two quickies:
First, Steve Schier was one of my profs when I was at Carleton and I still remember him saying that the Reagan tax cuts weren't part of program by the GOP to cut social services and starve the government a la Norquist's ultimate goal. Maybe he's paying more attention now.
Second, Doug's point was brought home to me by my grandfather who was an organizer in various UE locals (and other left-wing unions) before the AFL-CIO merger who said, and I quote, "Dues deduction is the death of organizing." After the merger he quit labor altogether figuring it had just castrated itself.
Posted by: NathanHJ | Oct 12, 2005 3:03:09 PM
What are you Democrats so worried about?? Just do what the UAW does...lie and hide the amount of Union dues that goes to elect Democratic candidates. I'm a political objector and according to the UAW they only use 4.5% of our money for political purposes. And if you believe that, you'll believe the UAW will save Delphi members.
Posted by: KGrace | Oct 15, 2005 9:52:46 PM
Sorry for being so late to the party, but did Prop 75 pass?
Posted by: Keefer | Jul 8, 2007 9:52:14 AM



Working Life's ongoing special section devoted to holding the Cafta Fifteen accountable.
Buy the Wal-Mart documentary for $12.95
