Working Life

« Inch by Inch: Solidarity Charters | Main | Gross Domestic Product: Misleading the People »

October 07, 2005

Bringing Down Mickey Mouse

    This is near and dear to my heart: how the heck do hundreds of thousands of creators (writers, artists, actors, theater people) take on an information industry that has become the most powerful single industry in human history? Understand, that this vertically-integrated industry spans telecommunications (voice, wireless, Internet), cable, software, and all things you can point to that create the stuff people read, watch, listen to and communicate with.

    So, out of the AFL-CIO Executive Council meeting yesterday comes some good news: the first Industry Coordinating Committee (the set-up that was created in response to the critique put out by the Change To Win effort that unions needed a strategic industry focus) has been formed for the unions dealing with the information industry.

    According to the AFL-CIO's press release, "The Arts, Entertainment, Media and Telecommunications ICC will build power for working people in this industry by undertaking collaborative initiatives in four principal areas -- organizing, collective bargaining, contract standards and public policy.  The 10 unions that are part of the new ICC are: Actors' Equity Association (AEA), American Federation of Musicians (AFM), American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), Communications Workers of America (CWA), International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE), International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians (NABET-CWA), Screen Actors Guild (SAG), The Newspaper Guild (TNG-CWA) and the Writers Guild of America East (WGAE).  Combined, these unions represent nearly one million workers in these sectors."

    I'm all for this. A few years ago, I started something called the Creators Federation which was aimed at bringing together all these unions that deal with a converging information industry. Much good work has been done by the AFL-CIO's Department of Professional Employees on this issue in the past--but it's a tough road because the DPE has to deal with a number of unions that, historically, have not always worked together.

    Admittedly, I have a bias believing that organizing the information industry may be the most crucial industry to organize in the next 10 years. It's not just about sheer numbers--because actually there are plenty of jobs in manufacturing, retails and service to organize. It's more the perception--people believe that consumption of information is the guiding principle of their lives (how many people carry IPods now?)--and the scary notion that such a powerful industry that shapes ideas and access to information will simply rule the roost with no brake on its insatiable appetite.

    If anyone has more interest in the shape of the industry and how it has evolved, you can go to the Creators Federation website and read the strategic power analysis that I wrote and published earlier this year.

October 7, 2005 in Inside Labor | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b76269e200d8348ffc1969e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bringing Down Mickey Mouse:

Comments

A good source of info re: organizing in the Telecommunications/IT industry is WashTech/CWA, "... the nation's leading union for high-tech workers ... Today, job security, health care, retirement plans, offshore outsourcing and visas are on our minds more than ever..."

http://www.washtech.org

Posted by: pablo | Oct 7, 2005 2:05:22 PM

it's great if the AFL can finally get some of these unions off the dime and doing something proactive. but two questions:

a) why the Writers Guild East but not West? especially since it looks like the two unions may be burying the hatchet-- see press today about settling the lawsuit between the two.

b) how, if at all, is this affected by the recent leradership changes in both SAG & WGA-West? theres been much press about the (relative) militancy of the new slates, but i don't really know what that means for these unions.

Posted by: Josh H. Pille | Oct 7, 2005 4:01:29 PM

Interesting article about class action lawsuits against video game companies on behalf of employees. Not surprisingly, htey have similar concerns to those aired by the actors who do video game voices, and the writers on reality shows. Seems like the more I hear, the more sense this ICC makes, hopefully it will produce some positive results.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/12831349.htm

Posted by: Ben | Oct 7, 2005 4:06:31 PM

Why the Writers Guild of America East, AFL-CIO, but not the Writers Guild of America? I guess that answers your question. You got to pay to play.

And more than that, I bet the WGAE probably at some point demanded of the AFL that the only way the WGAw could join the AFL was if it merged with the WGAE. (For example, like the IBT prevented UTU from rejoining any way except by merging with the IBT. Now that the IBT is out, it looks like the UTU will join the AFL. But hey, this has been going on for a long time--the UE could only join if it was willing to merge with the IUE originally, then, as IUE influence declined, if it was willing to merge with the USWA. This shit is actually the largest reason why the Carpenters left, they saw the AFL promising large affiliates mergers, and wanted the AFL to twist arms over at IUPAT to get them to merge into the UBC.)

Maybe its time for WGAE and WGAw to examine whether there is a reason for a merger, or to allow the WGAw to join the AFL as the WGAw. If not, maybe it is time to allow non-AFL unions to be part of the media/entertainment committee.

Posted by: Ralph | Oct 7, 2005 4:40:03 PM

Some facts:
WGAw attempted to join the AFL-CIO some years back when Brian Walton wsa the executive director--it was voted down by the membership partly as a referendum on Walton's leadership (for the unfamiliar, the executive directors of the entertainment unions run the union day-to-day and exercise enormous influence over the direction of the unions).

As for the recent leadership changes, it's slightly different in each union. SAG has had an on-going internal schism for a number of years. The new president, Alan Rosenberg, comes from the insurgent caucus, which now controls the majority of the board; it wants the union to have a more confrontational approach vis a vis the industry. At WGA, the new president, Patric Verrone, has a strong desire to kick in an organizing program--in particular, there is a big threat from the growing non-union reality shows.

Posted by: Tasini | Oct 7, 2005 5:26:42 PM

Post a comment